They submit reports of relevant research work. This report seems flawed to the authorities. A letter was sent to the researchers on behalf of the Asiatic Society. The letter described the research report as "a mess in terms of quality" and said it was "full of numerous flaws that show extreme negligence and lack of professionalism". Researchers were also accused of spelling mistakes and plagiarism.AMONG US MOD MENU AMONG US MOD MENU AMONG US MOD MENU AMONG US MOD MENU Click HERE BABY
According to the rules of research, their evaluation should be communicated to the concerned researchers. According to him, the researchers will make the necessary changes. Then comes the question of final approval. In this case, the traditional rules of research were not followed. The researchers gave preliminary reports. Evaluators have made various comments. But researchers have not been given a chance to revise the report. Grants earmarked for this study have since been canceled.
The news was recently published in an English daily. From the content of the news and its placement on the front page, it is clear that there is a conspiracy behind it. Such a news should not be on the front page without anyone's interest and fuel.
There are also statements of researchers in the news. The researchers said that they had inadvertently submitted a draft report prepared by the research collaborators. They later expressed regret and wanted to submit the final report. But as the authorities did not agree, they withdrew from the research by returning the money in advance.
The Asiatic Society later canceled the grant for that research. The incident is supposed to end here. There is no discussion about the research report which was not accepted, was not published anywhere and even the grant was canceled. But no, the incident did not go away at all. A special court is trying to muddy the water. News is being published in various media against those two teachers. And the information and data of this news is being provided from that special quarter. Because? To socially degrade those two researchers and teachers. Try not to talk too much. Behind this is the game of dirty politics of some people. Some former-current teachers of the university want to dominate everywhere. There is also the problem of looting. In this case, teachers who are ‘not loyal’ are often subjected to outstanding harassment in minor matters. As these two teachers have been.
The faction among the teachers in our country has now reached a terrible state. There is widespread factionalism in the policy of 'he who is not with me is against me'. By doing this, those who want to stay out of the party, want to play an independent role without floating in the conventional current, want to express their views without singing karta-bhaja kirtan, new dangers are waiting for them. They are often subjected to repression and harassment by the majority and the power.
Pleasureism and sexual harassment in university teacher politics have now become a tool to seduce someone or teach someone what they should. In most cases, allegations of plagiarism are being made against female teachers. Allegations of plagiarism are being made against those who are coming forward, wanting to play the role of defendants without floating in the river. Or allegations of sexual harassment. Male teachers are the main victims. These two sensitive issues have now become a tool to break the backbone of young teachers in the university. And it’s being done very consciously.
In our country, in order to educate a protesting person in the village, various stigmas are imposed on his name. As he gets drunk, he goes to the bad neighborhood. Bringing bad people home and having fun. Stays up many nights. Universities are still used to suppress anyone in that rural manner. The name of a person is slandered without giving him a chance to defend himself. In this way many talented people also became silent. Or leave the country. In this, the conspirators get an unrestricted opportunity to achieve their interests. This is a great misfortune for us.
This does not mean that the university teachers are all very good, there is no plagiarism, there is no sexual harassment. No irregularities are corruption. Yes, there is plagiarism, maybe more. But in most cases, the victims are innocent. The powerful managed to cross the pond by stealing the sea. And some are convicted of ‘tainted thieves’ for the slightest mistake. The same pattern is seen in the case of sexual harassment. There are many teachers who, despite regular sexual harassment, retain their positions of power. I also know teachers who have been accused of sexual harassment by certain quarters for talking to a student in a room on the basis of general student-teacher relationship. We want a university free of sexual harassment. I want too much. But I also want the moral backbone of an innocent teacher not to be broken by using sexual harassment as a tool.
And plagiarism is not a tool to suppress the opposition, but it should not enter the university, special measures should be taken in this regard. Recently, many teachers have been deliberately accused of plagiarism. The university system is responsible for plagiarism. In other countries of the world, plagiarism is very important in universities. But our university has no policy in this regard. There is not even awareness. Many teachers do not know what plagiarism is. And it is for this negligence that plagiarism is taking place in PhD theses and various research articles.
And in the case of the thesis, the observer is responsible for plagiarism. Because of the overall thesis
The main responsibility of the moment is the auditor. If he observes the matter then there is not supposed to be plagiarism. Pleasureism is happening due to negligence in audit. So the auditor must be aware. Then there will be no plagiarism.
As an independent country, Bangladesh started its journey with only six universities. At present, the number of government and non-government institutions is more than one and a half hundred. Universities are conducting thousands of research projects in various sectors. The university supports research projects in the promotion of teachers. It is alleged that many teachers in the country are promoted through plagiarized writing or plagiarized research. But since there is no policy on plagiarism at the national level, universities often cannot take any action in this regard. The universities of the country including Dhaka University do not have any specific policy or rules of plagiarism. The study also did not define what constitutes plagiarism. On the other hand, although some universities have a system for verifying research papers written in English, there is no system for verifying Bengali writings. As a result, there was no universal opportunity to verify plagiarism.
All concerned should be alert and aware about the matter. Appropriate policies need to be formulated. Complaints need to be raised appropriately by defining plagiarism. Otherwise, it will continue to be used as a tool of dirty teacher politics.
- Some of the Top players in the Medical Power Supply Market Astrodyne TDI Power Supplies & EMI Filters, CUI, Inc. (A Subsidiary of CUI, Inc. Global), Delta Electronics , Inc., Spellman High Voltage Electronics Corporation, Excelsys & Others